Manual QA testers
Exploratory, functional and regression testing by hand, with test cases kept in TestRail, Xray or your tracker.
Roles · Software Development
Manual testing for new features, automated suites for the flows that must never break, and bug reports your developers can act on straight away.
When developers test their own work, they test the path they built. Customers take every other path. A QA tester writes test cases from the requirements, tries the edge cases, checks the release on real browsers and devices, and builds an automated regression suite so last month's fix stays fixed.

What they do for you
Tools they work in
Strong answer: valid and invalid input, field limits, duplicates, error messages, keyboard use, slow networks, and what happens after submit, grouped by risk.
Strong answer: a clear title, environment, exact steps, expected and actual results, evidence attached, and severity they can justify.
Strong answer: stable, high-value flows such as login and checkout get automated. Exploratory and fast-changing screens stay manual for now.
Strong answer: treat flaky tests as bugs, look at waits, test data and environment, quarantine the worst offenders and fix the root cause.
Strong answer: check the requirement, bring the evidence, and ask the product owner to decide instead of arguing it out.
Strong answer: status codes, schema, required fields, auth and permissions, duplicate requests, and what the database looks like afterward.
Exploratory, functional and regression testing by hand, with test cases kept in TestRail, Xray or your tracker.
End-to-end and UI automation in Playwright, Cypress or Selenium, wired into your CI so every pull request runs the suite.
Functional, contract and load testing for REST and GraphQL APIs with Postman, REST Assured or k6.
iOS and Android testing on real devices and device clouds, with Appium automation for the screens that change least.
We agree the work, the tools, the hours you share and who they report to. For this role: your product and platforms, the tracker you log bugs in, your release rhythm, and if you need manual testing, automation or both.
We screen a wide pool for every role and introduce only the few who fit your brief. We source, screen and test candidates against your brief, and run background and reference checks. You interview and decide.
They start on the work in the brief, and we stay in contact once they've begun.
Manual testers are usually quick to find. An automation engineer who knows your framework of choice is a narrower search and may take a week or so longer. Candidates are typically based in South Africa unless your stack points us elsewhere.
QA testers can join through any of these models, and the decision stays with you. Questions about how they differ are welcome before you commit. Compare the arrangements on ways to hire.
Swipe to see more →
| Task | You | JiveTalent |
|---|---|---|
| What counts as release-ready, and bug priorities | Own | – |
| Test cases, bug reports and automated tests | Review | Done by your tester; we follow up on how they're working with your developers |
For manual testing, usually not. They need a test environment, accounts with the right roles and your tracker. Automation engineers need repository access so the tests sit next to the code.
The brief sets the hours and the overlap with your team before the search starts, so every candidate is hired for them.
You do. Test code lives in your repository, runs in your pipeline and stays with you if the engagement ends.
Talk to your account lead. We go through it with you and agree a way forward.
Often, yes. Say so in your brief and we look for experience on both. Large mobile apps can need a specialist of their own.
Some do, with tools such as k6 or JMeter. It's a separate skill from functional testing, so list it in the brief if it matters.
Their hours are tracked in the client app and reported there for you to see.
Book a call. We'll agree the brief for your QA tester and talk you through the ways to hire.